top of page
Ask & It Shall Be Given
Bad Doctrine
Study
Scripture
New Category
- 01This misunderstanding: • Creates a false dichotomy between grace and Torah • Ignores that Torah itself teaches grace • Misunderstands that grace enables Torah observance • Contradicts Yeshua's own words about Torah's continuity • Misinterprets Paul's teachings about grace • Fails to understand that grace teaches us to live righteously (Titus 2:11-12) • Ignores that we're saved for obedience, not from obedience
- 02This false teaching: • Ignores that Torah itself teaches grace • Misunderstands both concepts • Creates an unbiblical division • Fails to see how grace enables Torah observance • Overlooks that YHWH's Law is an expression of His love • Misses that grace and truth came through Yeshua (John 1:17) • Doesn't recognize that grace teaches us to live righteously
- 03This teaching is incorrect because: • No scriptural authority exists for changing YHWH's appointed times • The Sabbath is an eternal covenant sign (Exodus 31:16-17) • Yeshua kept the Sabbath and taught proper Sabbath observance • Early believers continued keeping the seventh-day Sabbath • The change was made by human authority, not divine command • The Sabbath is part of creation order (Genesis 2:2-3)
- 04This misunderstanding: • Contradicts Paul's own statements about the Law being holy and good (Romans 7:12) • Ignores that Paul himself kept Torah • Misses his teaching about proper Torah application • Overlooks his continued Temple worship • Disregards his statement "Do we nullify the Law through faith? May it never be!" (Romans 3:31) • Fails to understand his teachings in their Hebrew context • Forgets that Peter warned about misinterpreting Paul (2 Peter 3:15-16)
- 05This false teaching: • Contradicts the concept of grafting in (Romans 11) • Creates unbiblical division in YHWH's people • Misunderstands the New Covenant (Jeremiah 31:31-33) • Ignores that there is one law for native and stranger (Exodus 12:49) • Promotes replacement theology • Misses that believers join Israel, not replace it
- 06This misunderstanding: • Takes Mark 7 and Acts 10 out of context • Ignores that the biblical definition of food hasn't changed • Misses that unclean animals were never considered food • Overlooks that Peter still kept dietary laws after Acts 10 • Disregards YHWH's unchanging standards of clean and unclean • Fails to understand the symbolic language in Acts 10
bottom of page

