This misunderstanding: Creates a false dichotomy between grace and Torah Ignores that Torah itself teaches grace Misunderstands that grace enables Torah observance Contradicts Yeshua's own words about Torah's continuity Misinterprets Paul's teachings about grace Fails to understand that grace teaches us to live righteously (Titus 2:11-12) Ignores that we're saved for obedience, not from obedience

This false teaching: Ignores that Torah itself teaches grace Misunderstands both concepts Creates an unbiblical division Fails to see how grace enables Torah observance Overlooks that YHWH's Law is an expression of His love Misses that grace and truth came through Yeshua (John 1:17) Doesn't recognize that grace teaches us to live righteously

This teaching is incorrect because: No scriptural authority exists for changing YHWH's appointed times The Sabbath is an eternal covenant sign (Exodus 31:16-17) Yeshua kept the Sabbath and taught proper Sabbath observance Early believers continued keeping the seventh-day Sabbath The change was made by human authority, not divine command The Sabbath is part of creation order (Genesis 2:2-3)

This misunderstanding: Contradicts Paul's own statements about the Law being holy and good (Romans 7:12) Ignores that Paul himself kept Torah Misses his teaching about proper Torah application Overlooks his continued Temple worship Disregards his statement "Do we nullify the Law through faith? May it never be!" (Romans 3:31) Fails to understand his teachings in their Hebrew context Forgets that Peter warned about misinterpreting Paul (2 Peter 3:15-16)

This false teaching: Contradicts the concept of grafting in (Romans 11) Creates unbiblical division in YHWH's people Misunderstands the New Covenant (Jeremiah 31:31-33) Ignores that there is one law for native and stranger (Exodus 12:49) Promotes replacement theology Misses that believers join Israel, not replace it

This misunderstanding: Takes Mark 7 and Acts 10 out of context Ignores that the biblical definition of food hasn't changed Misses that unclean animals were never considered food Overlooks that Peter still kept dietary laws after Acts 10 Disregards YHWH's unchanging standards of clean and unclean Fails to understand the symbolic language in Acts 10